A Large-scale Study about Quality and Reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks
Jupyter Notebooks have been widely adopted by many different communities, both in science and industry. They support the creation of literate programming documents that combine code, text, and execution results with visualizations and all sorts of rich media. The self-documenting aspects and the ability to reproduce results have been touted as significant benefits of notebooks. At the same time, there has been growing criticism that the way notebooks are being used leads to unexpected behavior, encourage poor coding practices, and that their results can be hard to reproduce. To understand good and bad practices used in the development of real notebooks, we studied 1.4 million notebooks from GitHub. We present a detailed analysis of their characteristics that impact reproducibility. We also propose a set of best practices that can improve the rate of reproducibility and discuss open challenges that require further research and development.
Mon 27 May Times are displayed in time zone: (GMT-04:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) change
|11:55 - 12:10|
João Felipe Pimentel, Leonardo MurtaUniversidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Vanessa Braganholo, Juliana FreirePre-print
|12:10 - 12:25|
|12:25 - 12:31|